Fitch Affirms Lambert-St. Louis Int'l Airport (MO) at 'BBB+'; Outlook Revised to Positive

NEW YORK--()--Fitch Ratings has affirmed its 'BBB+' rating on St. Louis, MO's approximately $592.9 million outstanding airport revenue bonds. St. Louis also has $54.9 million of series 2012, 2013, and 2015 parity airport revenue bonds that are not rated by Fitch. The Rating Outlook is revised to Positive from Stable.

RATING RATIONALE

The Positive Outlook reflects the expectation that continued enplanement growth in conjunction with a renewed airline agreement providing full cost recovery terms will allow Lambert-St. Louis to maintain stable debt service coverage ratios (DSCR) and experience moderate reductions in leverage and airline costs. Fitch will assess these metrics over the next two years, as favorable performance may reflect a positive credit development.

The rating reflects the airport's status as a medium hub airport with stable financial metrics, limited competition from other airports and modes of transportation, manageable capital needs in the medium term, and expected maintenance of coverage levels consistent with recent norms. The rating also reflects modest carrier concentration, with Southwest Airlines representing 51% of total enplanements. The airport's strong airline use and lease agreement (AUL) provides sound financial protection in the event of additional airline service reductions.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Risk - Volume: Midrange

Solid Underlying Demand: The airport is the primary air service provider for the St. Louis metropolitan statistical area with limited competition within the area. The airport's traffic profile has shifted over the past decade and currently serves as an origination and destination (O&D) airport, with O&D representing 86% of the approximately 6.6 million total enplanements. While moderate carrier concentration exists with Southwest Airlines (51% of total enplanements), it is partially mitigated by the airline's long-term commitment to serve the airport.

Revenue Risk - Price: Midrange

Favorable Airline Use & Lease Agreement: The airline use agreement, which was recently negotiated and expires in 2021, provides a hybrid compensatory rate-setting approach while ensuring all necessary operating and debt service costs can be recovered through a residual-oriented financial backstop. Airline costs are elevated at $13.60 per enplanement in fiscal 2015 (ending June 30), but are expected to decrease nominally in conjunction with a declining debt service profile.

Infrastructure Development & Renewal: Stronger (Revised from Midrange)

Short-Term Planning: The new AUL includes a pre-approved five-year capital investment program (CIP) totaling $170 million. The CIP has received majority-in-interest (MII) approval from signatory carriers, and focuses on the maintenance, refurbishment, and modernization of airport assets. The airport may issue up to $86 million in general airport revenue bonds (GARBs) for the projects, with the remainder being funded with the airport's development fund and other equity sources.

Debt Structure: Stronger

Conservative Debt Profile: All of the airport's debt is fixed-rate with a declining amortization profile. Maximum annual debt service (MADS) of $75 million is scheduled in fiscal 2017, with debt service currently stepping down to approximately $66 million in fiscal 2019. Debt service continues to decline in subsequent years through maturity in fiscal 2034. Bond covenants and reserve requirements are satisfactory for an airport at this rating level.

Stable Financial Performance

Some financial limitations exist due to modest leverage and coverage levels. Net debt-to-cash flow available for debt service remains comparable to peers at 7.16x, while debt service coverage (including passenger facility charges and a rate mitigation coverage account) remained flat at 1.37x in fiscal 2015. The airport has adequate levels of restricted cash balances along with unrestricted cash equivalent to 183 days cash on hand (DCOH).

Peers

St. Louis' peers include Cleveland ('BBB+'/Stable Outlook) and Pittsburgh ('A'/Stable Outlook). Each airport has previously served as a domestic hub and has transitioned to a primarily O&D airport. St. Louis' leverage (7.16x) and cost per enplanement (CPE; $13.60) compares favorably to Cleveland's metrics of 8.63x and $18.37, respectively. Conversely, Pittsburgh has lower leverage (1.86x), and its airline costs are likely to reduce to a lower levels as debt rapidly amortizes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: Favorable traffic and non-aviation revenue growth, coupled with a stable cost profile, yielding reduced leverage below 8x on a sustained basis will likely result in positive rating action.

Negative: Higher leverage or operational volatility associated with enplanement declines or airline costs could lead to negative rating action.

CREDIT UPDATE

STL, a medium hub airport as designated by the Federal Aviation Administration, is owned and operated by the City of St. Louis. According to the Airports Council International North American Traffic Report, with 6.7 million enplanements in 2016, St Louis ranked 31st for busiest airport nationwide. While the airport is served by seven major and national passenger carriers, there is a modest degree of service dependency from Southwest Airlines, accounting for 51% of the airport's total enplanements. Origin and Destination traffic represents approximately 85% of total traffic.

PERFORMANCE UPDATE

Fiscal 2016 traffic increased by a sizable 6.7% (to 6.67 million enplanements) over the previous year. This exceeds a five-year compound annual growth rate of 1.2%. The increase was largely a result of Southwest Airlines adding multiple new daily service routes in the second half of the fiscal year. Southwest's expanded operations include daily service to Little Rock, AR, Pittsburgh, PA, Des Moines, IA, Wichita, KS, Cleveland, OH, Oakland, CA, and Portland, OR. Fiscal 2017 traffic through August reflects a 7.9% increase over the same time period in 2016.

Based on Fitch calculations, fiscal 2015 revenue decreased 4.1% from 2014. The decline was primarily driven by inflated revenues in fiscal 2014 pertaining to non-aviation revenue, particularly proceeds from the sale of airline stock from a settlement agreement with American Airlines following their emergence from bankruptcy protection. Airline revenue decreased 3.9% in fiscal 2015. Expenses decreased 4.4% in fiscal 2015 following a 9.1% increase in the prior year. The fiscal 2015 expense reduction was attributable to a decrease in supplies, facilities and grounds expenses, and contractual services. Preliminary results for fiscal 2016 show expenditure growth of 1.8%.Preliminary results from fiscal 2016 reflect a 1% increase in total revenues over the previous year.

In conjunction with the recent AUL renewal, the airport outlined a pre-approved five-year capital improvement program totaling approximately $170 million. The five-year CIP program consists of projects involving the maintenance, refurbishment, replacement, and modernization of existing airport facilities, infrastructure, and equipment. The city is looking at using up to $86 million in GARBs with a 30 year term to fund the cost remaining after PFC funds, Airport Improvement Program funds, Airport Development Funds, other equity sources. The city contemplates that approximately $58 million in GARBs would be issued in FY2018 and approximately $28 million in GARBs in FY2020.

FITCH CASES

Fitch's cases, which span from 2016 to 2021, utilize the issuer's consultant-based traffic and revenue assumptions, while adding its own additional stresses. Additional preliminary CIP debt was not included in the issuer's projections, but incorporated in Fitch's cases. Under the base case, traffic grows at a CAGR of 3% in fiscal 2017 followed by annual growth of 1.5%. Non-airline revenue growth rates follow annual traffic changes and inflationary growth, while airline revenues were adjusted to maintain debt service coverage consistent with historical norms. Fitch-calculated average DSCR on GARB debt is satisfactory at 1.35x, with CPE falling to $12.03. Leverage falls to an average of 6.48x as debt is repaid.

Under the rating case, traffic increases 3% in 2017 followed by an 8% decline in 2018. Annual recovery follows thereafter. Airline revenue growth follows annual traffic changes absent inflationary growth, and incorporates a 3% increase in 2018 to offset the 8% traffic stress, followed by a 3% decline in the subsequent year to reflect normalization of revenue trends. Operating expenses are stressed an additional 0.5%. Fitch-calculated average DSCR on GARB debt is average at 1.33x, while average CPE grows relatively high to $13.07. Despite projected debt issuance, average leverage is still manageable at 6.59x, while liquidity remained relatively unchanged from the base case at 151 DCOH.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.

Applicable Criteria

Rating Criteria for Airports (pub. 25 Feb 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/877676

Rating Criteria for Infrastructure and Project Finance (pub. 08 Jul 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/882594

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1014455

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1014455

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright (c) 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Mark Lazarus
Associate Director
+1-312-368-3219
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
70 W. Madison St.
Chicago, IL 60602
or
Secondary Analyst
Seth Lehman
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0755
or
Committee Chairperson
Scott Zuchorski
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0659
or
Media Relations
Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278
sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Mark Lazarus
Associate Director
+1-312-368-3219
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
70 W. Madison St.
Chicago, IL 60602
or
Secondary Analyst
Seth Lehman
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0755
or
Committee Chairperson
Scott Zuchorski
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0659
or
Media Relations
Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278
sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com