LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Attorneys with Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and Miller Advocacy Group have filed a nationwide, class action lawsuit against ACT, administrator of the leading U.S. standardized college-entrance exam, for violating the civil rights of students with disabilities under federal and California law. Plaintiffs allege and seek to end the illegal practice by the college admissions gatekeeper of acquiring the disability status of students taking the ACT Test and then disclosing their confidential disability information on score reports to colleges and other programs as well as selling the information to them for recruitment and enrollment purposes -- a direct violation of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), Unruh Act, California Constitution, and California's Unfair Competition Law.
"ACT flags students' test scores, discloses their confidential information to colleges pre-admission, and stigmatizes students with disabilities in the admissions process," says Rahul Ravipudi of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP. "Not only does this unlawful practice violate the privacy, security and confidentiality of information entrusted to ACT by the students in its care – it does so for profit, and at the expense of America's most vulnerable students who are striving to further their education."
Mr. Ravipudi is assisted on the matter by Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and social justice attorney Jesse Creed as well as attorney Marci Lerner Miller of Miller Advocacy Group.
As alleged in the complaint filed in United States District Court, Central District of California, ACT illegally uses student disability information in two primary ways. First, ACT "flags" student score reports by disclosing detailed student disability information and the use of accommodations on the score reports it sends to colleges. The company collects this information through questions on the online ACT Student Profile Section that every student fills out when registering for the college-entrance exam, as well as through its Student Information Form that test takers must respond to on test day without their parents, teachers or counselors present. Second, ACT sells the detailed student disability data to various postsecondary organizations including colleges, scholarship programs, and other third parties who use it for recruitment and marketing related to the admissions process. ACT knows that colleges must practice "disability-blind" admissions under federal civil rights laws and seeks to circumvent this prohibition on colleges by acquiring the information for them.
Unlike the ACT score reports sent to colleges, the teenage test-takers as well as the high schools they attend are intentionally kept unaware of ACT’s practice of reporting confidential disability status to colleges, because the ACT score reports sent to students as well as those ACT score reports sent to the student's high school do not show any disability information.
Plaintiff Halie Bloom is a college-bound, 2018 high school graduate who had an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) under the IDEA and a 504 Plan under the Rehabilitation Act since middle school, and she took the ACT several times with approved accommodations. ACT acquired Ms. Bloom's disability status from her testing registration and annotated her score reports with "learning or cognitive disability" that requires special provisions. ACT disclosed Ms. Bloom's disabilities on all ACT Test score reports sent on her behalf to colleges to which she applied and thereby flagged her score reports. She had no expectation that ACT would include her disability status with her score reports or otherwise ever disclose her confidential disability information.
ACT also sold the details of Halie’s disabilities as part of its enrollment management services without her knowledge or permission, allowing colleges and scholarship organizations to exclude her on the basis of her disability status.
"I was shocked to learn that ACT was using my disability information against me and making it more difficult for me to get into college and get the money I need to go to college," says Ms. Bloom. "I'm speaking out, because I know that someone has to stand-up for all of the students who are scared about how their disabilities will be used against them."
Ms. Bloom, as well as the plaintiffs and subclass members named in the lawsuit, has suffered actual damages as well as emotional distress, anxiety, lost opportunity, frustration, humiliation, loss of dignity and self-esteem as a direct result of ACT's unlawful practices and are seeking restitution at trial. They are likewise seeking a nationwide injunction to stop this practice.
About Panish Shea & Boyle LLP
Panish Shea & Boyle LLP represents plaintiffs in wrongful death, catastrophic personal injury, product liability, mass torts, and business litigation cases. Firm attorneys are repeatedly recognized for their excellence by other trial lawyers, legal organizations and publications nationwide and have dedicated themselves to obtaining justice for clients who are dealing with a life-altering injury, death of a family member or other challenges caused by the wrongful act of another. The firm is consistently ranked among the best plaintiff's law firms in the country, including by U.S. News & World Report, where it has been recognized as a Tier One law firm in the areas of Plaintiffs Personal Injury Litigation and Plaintiffs Product Liability Litigation, as well as by the National Law Journal which named the firm in its Elite Trial Lawyers list. www.psblaw.com
About Miller Advocacy Group
Miller Advocacy Group is a full-service education and disability rights law firm that provides a continuum of advocacy and counseling services designed to prepare students for the successful transition to college and postsecondary life. All firm attorneys and advocates are the parents of children with disabilities, and use their personal experience, as well as their years of combined professional experience, to serve students and families who need assistance navigating the educational system. www.milleradvocacy.com
