Fitch Affirms ConEd & Subsidiaries at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

NEW YORK--()--Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) and debt ratings of Consolidated Edison Inc. (ED) and its regulated utility subsidiaries Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. (ORU), and Rockland Electric Co. (RECO).

Fitch has also affirmed the ratings of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority's (NYSERDA) issued debt of which CECONY and ORU are the obligors.

The Rating Outlook for all entities is Stable. A complete list of rating actions follows at the end of this release.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Predictable Cash Flows: ED's credit profile is supported by the predictable cash flows of CECONY and sister utility ORU and the financial support it receives from them in the form of dividends for the payment of corporate expenses, dividends to common shareholders, and for other business matters. Fitch estimates the regulated utilities will contribute, on average, roughly 95% of consolidated EBITDA over 2016-2020 with the remainder provided by ED's competitive energy businesses and the electric and gas transmission operations of ED's wholly-owned subsidiary Con Edison Transmission, Inc. (CET).

Regulatory Visibility: The three-year joint proposal reached between CECONY and various intervenors would provide regulatory visibility through 2019. Under the proposed rate plan, CECONY would receive aggregate electric and gas base rate increases of $505 million and $177 million, respectively, over 2017-2019. CECONY's projected earnings and cash flows would further benefit from the expiration of a combined $89 million of temporary bill credits which were implemented under the existing rate plans. Fitch considers the rate outcomes reflected in the joint proposal to be balanced and in line with previous expectations. Further adding earnings and cash flow stability, ORU operates under a multi-year plan that provides regulatory predictability for the electric business through October 2017 and for the gas business through October 2018. The utility was granted a total of $67.3 million of rate relief over the next three years.

On a negative note, the 9% authorized ROE reflected in New York rate orders and as proposed in the joint proposal is significantly below the 9.6% ROE granted to utilities nationwide in 2015. However, the utilities enjoy several mechanisms that Fitch considers to be supportive of credit quality including forward-looking test years, multi-year rate plans, trackers for large operating expenses, and a revenue decoupling mechanism that isolates net margins from variations in retail sales. Those mechanisms do support the utilities' financial stability in the long term. A final decision by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC) is expected by year-end 2016.

Manageable JV Investment: Fitch considers ED's purchase of a 50% ownership interest in a midstream joint venture (JV) with Crestwood Equity Partners LP (Crestwood) as largely manageable within ED's existing credit profile. ED made cash contribution of $975 million for its ownership interest which was funded with a balanced mix of debt and equity. The JV will own and develop Crestwood's three existing natural gas pipelines and four storage facilities located in northern Pennsylvania and southern New York, well situated within the core of the Northeast Pennsylvania Marcellus shale gas-rich supply area. The JV builds upon ED's acquisition of a 12.5% ownership interest in the Mountain Valley Pipeline project in early 2016, and provides opportunities for additional growth with management's expectation of several infrastructure expansion projects in the Northeast region coming online by 2022. These projects will directly benefit ED as one of the shippers on the pipelines.

Given the modest scope of the initial JV investment, with cash distributions projected to contribute approximately 2% of ED's consolidated EBITDA on average, and JV acquisition debt representing approximately 3% of consolidated debt at year-end 2015, Fitch considers the impact of the transaction on ED's financial profile to be marginal. Importantly, parent-level debt is projected to remain within manageable levels in the low 10% of the consolidated capital structure.

Potential concerns around ED's expansion into midstream are somewhat offset by the nature of Crestwood's contracted assets with approximately 93% of revenue generated from stable, take-or-pay contracts with relatively moderate re-contracting risk and limited volume risk. However, Fitch has concerns about counterparty credit risk. Fitch estimates approximately 50%-60% of revenue is driven by E&P customers, including a mix of investment-grade and high-yield names. Two of the top three pipeline customers are rated below investment-grade by Fitch with the pipeline segment representing close to half of total JV revenue. Cash flow distributions could be lower than anticipated in the event high-yield customers experience financial distress and cannot meet their capacity commitments.

Event Risk: Fitch is concerned with CECONY's cash flow exposure to potential regulatory fines associated with the East Harlem natural gas explosion. The NYSPSC is conducting an investigation of the accident to determine if the utility bears some responsibility. There is no established timeline for the NYSPSC to render its decision, and Fitch will continue to monitor the progress of the investigation. Any ratings impact will be based on the amount and timing of potential fines and civil lawsuits as well as insurance coverage.

On a positive note, CECONY resolved the contractor kickback investigation with the NYSPSC as the commission approved a joint proposal reached between the utility and multiple parties, requiring CECONY to credit $116 million to customers, and for the period 2017 to 2044, to not seek to recover from customers an aggregate $55 million relating to return on capex.

Elevated Capex: Management expects consolidated capex to amount to approximately $11.91 billion over 2016 - 2018, compared with approximately $8.79 billion over 2013 - 2015. Utility capex, representing approximately 79% of total spending over the forecast period, is earmarked primarily towards replacement of aged infrastructure, network reliability enhancement and heating oil-to-gas conversions of residential and commercial buildings in New York City, which the company projects will support peak gas growth of about 2.3% over the next five years. Capital investments associated with the 'Reforming the Energy Vision' (REV) initiative are projected to represent approximately 3% of total utility spending over the next three years and are earmarked primarily towards demand-side management projects and energy efficiency. Recovery of REV spending is to be reflected in base rates coupled with earnings adjustment mechanisms (EAMs) that provide utility incentives to achieve peak system reduction targets.

Remaining capex is earmarked towards investments in renewables and energy infrastructure projects, which is estimated to represent roughly 17% of consolidated capex, and electric transmission and gas pipeline projects at CET with 4% of total capex. Fitch expects ED to fund non-utility capex in a relatively conservative manner, using a balanced mix of internally generated cash flows, long-term debt, including non-recourse project level debt for renewable investments, and common equity.

Credit Metrics: Fitch projects consolidated FFO-fixed charge coverage ratio to average near 4.8x and adjusted debt/EBITDAR, 4x, over 2016-2020. FFO-adjusted leverage ratio is projected to average near 4.1x over the same time frame. For the LTM period ended June 30, 2016, ED's FFO-fixed charge coverage ratio was 5.4x, FFO adjusted leverage, 4.2x, and adjusted debt/EBITDAR 4.3x.

Fitch expects CECONY's credit metrics to remain relatively stable over the forecast period but with limited headroom at the current rating levels. Fitch forecasts CECONY's FFO-fixed charge coverage ratio to average near 4.8x, and adjusted debt/EBITDAR, 3.7x, over 2016-2020. FFO-adjusted leverage ratio is forecasted to average near 4x. For the LTM period ended June 30, 2016, FFO-fixed charge coverage was 5.6x, FFO-adjusted leverage, 4x, and adjusted debt/EBITDAR, 3.9x.

ORU's FFO-fixed charge coverage ratio is forecasted to average 5.3x, and adjusted debt/EBITDAR, 3.6x, over 2016-2020, comfortably in line with the 'BBB+' rating category. FFO-adjusted leverage ratio is forecasted to average near 3.6x over the same time frame. For the LTM period ended June 30, 2016, FFO-fixed charge coverage was 5.8x, FFO-adjusted leverage 3.3x, and adjusted debt/EBITDAR, 3.2x.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer include:

--Base rate increase at CECONY effective in 2017 per the JP;

--ORU base rate increases as per the existing rate plan;

--Consolidated capex of $11.91 billion over 2016-2018;

--EBITDA adjusted for dividend distributions from the Crestwood JV;

--$300 million to $350 million of cash proceeds from divestitures of various businesses and assets.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively lead to a positive rating action:

Given the limited headroom in credit metrics for the current rating category, no positive rating action is anticipated in the near term.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a negative rating action:

--Given the strong financial ties, a downgrade at Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.;

--FFO adjusted leverage greater than 5x or adjusted debt/EBITDAR greater than 4.2x on a sustained basis;

--A more aggressive management strategy towards the unregulated businesses, including investments into more volume/commodity-price sensitive midstream operations, that leads to incremental parent leverage.

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a positive rating action:

Given the limited headroom in credit metrics for the current rating category, no positive rating action is anticipated in the near term.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a negative rating action:

--A significant deterioration in the New York regulatory compact;

--An adverse outcome associated with the investigation of the East Harlem gas explosion that results in material fines and incremental leverage;

--FFO-adjusted leverage greater than 5x or adjusted debt/EBITDAR greater than 3.9x on a sustained basis.

Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. and Rockland Electric Co.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a positive rating action:

--An upgrade of ED.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a negative rating action:

--A downgrade of ED;

--FFO-adjusted leverage greater than 5x or adjusted debt/EBITDAR greater than 3.9x on a sustained basis.

LIQUIDITY

Group liquidity is supported by a $2.25 billion shared bank credit facility that expires in October 2017. At June 30, 2016, there was $2,402 million of available consolidated liquidity, including $1,540 million of unused facilities and $862 million of cash and cash equivalents. Consolidated debt maturities are considered manageable with $725 million due in 2016, none due in 2017, and $1,250 million due in 2018.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings with a Stable Outlook:

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

--Long-term IDR at 'BBB+';

--Short-term IDR at 'F2';

--Commercial paper at 'F2';

--Senior unsecured debt at 'BBB+'.

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

--Long-term IDR at 'BBB+';

--Short-term IDR at 'F2';

--Commercial paper at 'F2';

--Senior unsecured debt at 'A-';

--NYSERDA issues relating to CECONY projects at 'A-'.

Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.

--Long-term IDR at 'BBB+';

--Short-term IDR at 'F2';

--Commercial paper at 'F2';

--Senior unsecured debt at 'A-'.

Rockland Electric Co.

--Long-term IDR at 'BBB+'.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.

Applicable Criteria

Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/885629

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1013807

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1013807

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright (c) 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Philippe Beard
Director
+1-212-908-0242
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst
Barbara Chapman
Senior Director
+1-646-582-4886
or
Committee Chairperson
Peter Molica
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0288
or
Media Relations
Alyssa Castelli, +1 212-908-0540
alyssa.castelli@fitchratings.com

Contacts

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Philippe Beard
Director
+1-212-908-0242
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst
Barbara Chapman
Senior Director
+1-646-582-4886
or
Committee Chairperson
Peter Molica
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0288
or
Media Relations
Alyssa Castelli, +1 212-908-0540
alyssa.castelli@fitchratings.com